西内SINE

我们就把这一站叫做大坝站吧。有些人认为中国和美国是非常不同的。共产主义对阵资本主义。但我认为它们并没有太大的不同。像水坝。它们非常大，需要很多人来建造。它也需要得到很多人的认可。这是共同的努力。你可以称之为国民项目。这和公社是类似的。中国从来没有奥拉想要的真正的共产主义。即使自称为共产主义国家，但是中国是住房、车辆等私有制，大企业公有制的混合体；与美国的最大不同是，中国尽管有一个类似议会的组织，但高层有更大的领导权力。当决策是好的时候，这很好。但是当决策有误时就遭殃了。农民在农村集体所有制期间就挨饿了。糟糕的决策。
Let us call this the dam stop. Some people think China and US are very different. Communist against Capitalist. But I think they are not so different. Like dams. They're very big, and it takes many people to make them. It takes many people agreeing to make them. It is a communal effort. You call it a civil effort, or civic effort. Which it the same thing as communal effort. - China never had true communism that Aura wants. Even when it called itself Communist, China was a mix of private ownership of homes, vehicles, and so on, but public ownership of enterprises; different from America mainly because of a greater degree of direction from the top, despite a kind of parliament. Fewer cooks in the kitchen makes it easier to get things done. This is good when the ideas are good. Bad when the ideas are bad. The peasantry starved during rural collectives. Bad idea.

1980年左右开始允许更多的私有制，这激发了更多的竞争，消除了物质稀缺，但也让大型企业的老板发家致富。中国现在拥有的亿万富翁比美国还多。但当一个企业几乎成为垄断企业时，证明其正当性的唯一方法就是让整个社会都成为所有者，然后可能就有了公社主义。也许你会对大企业征税，然后分配财富。但企业家们仍然拼命赚钱致富。我认为中国和美国将走上同样的道路。
Allowing more private ownership starting around 1980 started more competition that eliminated scarcity but also made massive enterprises making their heads rich. China has more billionaires than the U.S. now. But when an enterprise is almost a monopoly, maybe the only way to justify it is to make the whole society the owner, and then maybe you have commune ism. Maybe you tax the big enterprise and distribute the wealth. but still let the entrepreneur practice their hobby that made them so rich. I think China and the US are going to the same thing.